Fertility patterns have changed significantly in most European countries since the 1960s. Although there are important differences both between and within countries in the pace of decline, by the 1990s fertility reached below replacement levels across Europe, with several countries experiencing lowest-low levels (less than 1.31 children per woman) (European Commission 2006a). Declining fertility is one aspect of an inter-related package of demographic trends that both reflect and constitute a transformation of the context in which people may or may not partner and parent. Debates within demography over the causes and consequences of the second demographic transition have been paralleled by sociological debate on the impact of individualism on personal life. This chapter considers these debates in relation to findings from analysis of the British cohort studies looking at changes over time in the propensity to delayed childbearing.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Fertility histories are also collected at age 23 years for the NCDS cohort; although a cross-sectional approach was favoured for the analysis of NCDS data in this study.
- 2.
Initial analysis was carried out looking at religiosity. The Second Demographic Transition attributes declining fertility to, inter alia, a growth of values of self-realisation and freedom from traditional forces of authority such as religion and previous research reports a correlation between increased religious activity and more traditional attitudes to family (e.g. Berrington and Diamond, 2000; Oláh, 2005). However, while there was a decline in religiosity evident (only 11 per cent of the 1970-born cohort who defined themselves as having a religion attended services at least monthly, compared with 30 per cent of the 1958 cohort), there was no significant association with remaining childless in one’s early thirties.
- 3.
Marital status distinguishes the currently married (whether first or subsequent), the previously married (the separated or divorced, as well as the very small numbers widowed in each cohort), and the never-married. Partnership status distinguishes those currently cohabiting: partnership histories record relationships in which respondents ‘lived with someone as a couple’ for a month or more. However, as Murphy (2000) observes, assuming all co-residential partnerships as equivalent raises several issues: these may differ not just in de jure status, but in terms of the meanings and motivations these hold for respondents.
References
Bagavos, C. and Martin, C. (2000) Low fertility, families, and public policies, Synthesis Report of the Annual Seminar, The European Observatory on the Social Situation, Demography and Family, Seville, 15–16 September.
Bauman, Z. (2000) Liquid Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Beck, U. (1999) World Risk Society, Polity Press, Malden, Mass.
Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love, Polity Press, Oxford.
Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2001) Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences, Sage, London.
Berrington, A. (2003) Change and continuity in family formation among young adults in Britain, SSRC Working Paper A03/04, University of Southampton, Southampton.
Berrington, A. (2004) Perpetual postponers? Women, men’s and couple’s fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour, Population Trends, 117, Autumn.
Berrington, A. and Diamond, I. (2000) Marriage or cohabitation: a competing risks analysis of first-partnership formation amongst the 1958 British birth cohort, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 163: 127–151.
Blossfeld, H.-P. (1995) Changes in the process of family formation and women’s growing economic independence: A comparison of nine countries, In Blossfeld, H.-P. (ed.) The New Role of Women. Family Formation in Modern Societies. Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 3–32.
Brewster, K.L. and Rindfuss, R.R. (2000) Fertility and women’s employment in industrialized nations, Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 271–96.
Caldwell, J. and Schindlmayr, T. (2003) Explanations of fertility crisis in modern societies: a search for commonalities, Population Studies, 57(3): 241–263.
Cameron, J. (1997) Without Issue: New Zealanders Who Choose to not have Children, Canterbury University Press, Christchurch NZ.
Castles, F. G. (2003) The world turned upside down: below replacement fertility, changing preferences and family-friendly public policy in 21 OECD countries, Journal of European Social Policy, 13: 209–227.
De Cooman, E, Ermisch, J. and Joshi, H. (1987) The next birth and the labour market: a dynamic model of births in England and Wales, Population Studies, 41(2): 237–268.
Di Salvo, P. (2005) Child histories – reconciling self-completion and interview data, NCDS5 Data Note 10, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, London, http://www.cls.ioe.ac.uk.
Ermisch, J. (1996) Analysis of leaving the parental home and returning to it using BHPS data, Working Paper 96–1, Working Papers of the ESRC Research Centre Micro-Social Change, University of Essex, Colchester.
Esping-Anderson, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
European Commission (2006a) Eurostat Indicators, Total Fertility Rates Eurostat, Statistical Office of the European Communities Unit F1: Demographic and migration statistics, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
European Commission (2006b) Eurostat Indicators, Live Births outside Marriage. Eurostat, Statistical Office of the European Communities Unit F1: Demographic and migration statistics, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
Ferri, E. Bynner, J. and Wadsworth, M. (eds.) (2003) Changing Britain, Changing Lives: Three Generations At The Turn Of The Century, London: Insitute of Education, University of London, London.
Ferri, E. and Smith, K. (2003) Partnerships and parenthood, in Ferri, E, Bynner, J. and Wadsworth, M. (eds.) Changing Britain, Changing Lives: Three Generations at the Turn of the Century, Institute of Education, University of London, London.
Folbre, N. (1994) Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint, Routledge, London.
Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation Of Intimacy. Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Greene, M. and Biddlecom, A. (2000) Absent and problematic men: demographic accounts of male reproductive roles, Population and Development Review, 26(1): 81–115.
Gustaffson, S.S, Kenjoh, E. and Wetzels, C. (2002) The role of education on postponement of maternity in Britain, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden, in Ruspini, E.and Dale, A. (eds.) The Gender Dimension of Social Change, The Policy Press, Bristol.
Hakim, C. (2003) A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: preference theory’, Population and Development Review, 29(3): 349–374.
Haskey, J. (1992) Pre-marital cohabitation and the probability of subsequent divorce: analyses using new data from the General Household Survey, Population Trends, 68: 10–9.
Hobcraft, J. (2004) Method, theory and substance in understanding choices about becomgin a parent: progress or regress? Comment on Caldwell and Schindlmayr’s ‘Explanations of the fertility crisis in modern societies: a search for commonalities’, Population Studies, 58(1): 81–84.
Hobson, B. and Olah, L.Sz. (2006a) Birthstrikes? Agency and capabilities in the reconciliation of employment and family, Marriage and Family Review, No. 39, The Haworth Press, Binghamton NY.
Hobson, B. and Olah, L.Sz. (2006b) The positive turn or birthstrikes? Sites of resistance to residual male breadwinner societies and to welfare state restructuring, Recherche et Previsions No. 83 (March), Special Issue: Kind and Welfare State. Reforms of Family Policies in Europe and North America, CNAF.
Hoem, B. (2000) Entry into motherhood in Sweden: the influence of economic factors on the rise and fall in fertility, 1986–1997, Demographic Research, online journal available at http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol2/4.
Hoshchild, A. (2001) The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work, Henry Holt, New York.
Irwin, S. (2005) Reshaping Social Life, Routledge, London.
Joshi, H. (2002) Production, reproduction and education: women, children and work in contemporary Britain, Population and Development Review, 28(3): 445–474.
Kiernan, K. (1998) Parenthood and family life in the United Kingdom, Review of Population and Social Policy, 7: 63–81.
Kohler, H.-P., Billari, F.C and Ortega, J. (2002) The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s, Population and Development Review, 28(4): 641–680.
Leete, R. (1998) Dynamics of Values in Fertility Change, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Lesthaeghe, R. (1995) The second demographic transition in western countries: an interpretation, in Mason, K. and Jensen, A.M. (eds.) Gender and Family Change in Industrialized Countries, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Lesthaeghe, R. and Neels, K. (2002) From the first to the second demographic transition: An interpretation of the spatial continuity of demographic innovation in France, Belgium and Switzerland, European Journal of Population, 18(4): 325–360.
Lewis, J. (2006) Perceptions of risk in intimate relationships, Journal of Social Policy, 35(1): 39–57.
Lisle, L. (1999) Without Child, Routledge, New York.
Makepeace, G. Dolton, P., Woods, L., Joshi, H., and Galinda-Rueda, F. (2003) From school to the labour market, in Ferri, E., Bynner, J. and Wadsworth, M. (eds.) Changing Britain, Changing Lives, Institute of Education, London.
McDonald, P. (2000a) The “toolbox” of public policies to impact on fertility – a global view, Paper presented at seminar on ‘Low Fertility, Families and Public Policies, organised by European Observatory on Family Matters, Sevilla, Sept 15–16.
McDonald, P. (2000b) Gender equity in theories of fertility transition, Population and Development Review, 26(3): 427–439.
Meron, M. and Widmer, I. (2002) Unemployment leads women to postpone the birth of their first child, Population-E 2002, 57(2): 301–330.
Murphy, M. (1992) Economic models of fertility in post-war Britain – a conceptual and statistical re-interpretation, Population Studies, 46(2): 235–258.
Murphy, M. (1993) The contraceptive pill and women’s employment as factors of fertility change in Britain 1963–1980: a challenge to conventional view, Population Studies, 47(2): 221–243.
Murphy, M. (2000) The evolution of cohabitation in Britain, 1960–1995, Population Studies, 54 (1): 43–56.
Oláh, L.Sz. (2005) First childbearing at higher ages in Sweden and Hungary: a gender approach, Paper presented at the 15th Nordic Demographic Symposium, Aalborg University, Denmark, 28–30th April.
ONS (Office of National Statistics) (2008) Social Trends 38, Palgrave MacMillan, Hampshire.
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1994) Women’s rising employment and the future of the family in industrialised societies, Population and Development Review, 20(2): 293–342.
Perrons, D. (2003) The new economy and the work life balance, Gender Work and Organisation, 10(1): 65–93.
Perrons, D. (2002) Gendered divisions in the new economy: risks and opportunities, GeoJournal, 56: 271–280.
Plewis, I., Calderwood, L., Hawkes, D, and Nathan, G. (2004) Technical Report: Changes in the NDCS and BCS7 Populations and Samples over Time, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education, University of London, London.
Presser, H. (2001) Comment: a gender perspective for understanding low fertility in post-transitional societies, Population and Development Review, 27: 177–183.
Rendall, M, Clarke, L, Peters, H. E, Ranjit, N, Verropoulou, G. (1999) Incomplete reporting of male fertility in the United States and Britain: a research note, Demography, 36(1):135–144.
Shepherd, P. (1995) The National Child Development Study: an introduction to the origins of the study and the methods of data collection, NCDS User Support Working Paper 1 (revised), Social Statistics Research Unit, City University: London.
Simpson, R. (2005) Contemporary Spinsterhood in Britain: Gender, Partnership Status and Social Change, PhD thesis, University of London, London.
Smart, C. (2007) Personal Life: New Directions in Sociological Thinking, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Smith, K. and Ferri, E. (2003) Housing, in Ferri, E., Bynner, J. and Wadsworth, M. (eds.) Changing Britain, Changing Lives, Institute of Education, London.
Sobotka, T. (2004) Postponement of Childbearing and Low Fertility in Europe, PhD thesis, University of Groningen. Dutch University Press, Amsterdam.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (ed.) (2004) New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Van de Kaa, D.J. (1987) Europe’s second demographic transition, Population Bulletin, 42(1): 1–47.
Van de Kaa, D.J. (1994) The second demographic transition revisited: theories and expectations, in Beets, G, van den Brekel, H, Cliquet, R, Dooghe, G, and de Jong Gierveld, J. (eds.) Population and Family in the Low Countries 1993: Late Fertility and Other Current Issues, NIDI/CBGS Publication, No. 30, Swets and Zeitlinger, Berwyn, Pennsylvania/Amsterdam, pp. 81–126.
Van de Kaa, D.J. (2004) The true commonality: in reflexive societies fertility is a derivative, Population Studies, 58 (1): 77–80.
Veevers, J.E. (1980) Childless by Choice, Butterworths, Toronto.
Wasoff, F. and Dey, I. (2007) Fertility variations in Scotland: actual, expected and ideal fertility, CRFR Research Briefing 32, CRFR: University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Watkins, S.C. (1993) If all we knew about women was what we read in demography, what would we know? Demography, 30(4): 551–577.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simpson, R. (2009). Delayed Childbearing and Childlessness. In: Kneale, D., Coast, E., Stillwell, J. (eds) Fertility, Living Arrangements, Care and Mobility. Understanding Population Trends and Processes, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9682-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9682-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9681-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9682-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)