Gender segregation of housework

TSUTSUI Junya
(Ritsumeikan University)
A Quantitative Picture of Contemporary Japanese Families: Tradition and Modernity in the 21st Century (Tohoku University Press) (2013-03-28)
Title: Gender segregation of housework
Author: TSUTSUI Junya (筒井 淳也)
Page: 123–146
Short URL: http://tsigeto.info/qfam/book/5


Abstract

Chapter 5. Gender segregation of housework

  1. 1. Sexual segregation within domestic labor
  2. 2. Previous research and theoretical hypothesis: Categorization of domestic labor and how housework is shared
  3. 3. Data, variables, and method of analysis
  4. 4. Results of analysis
  5. 5. Discussion and implications

Keywords

Tables

Table 1–5

Figures

Figure 1–3

References

  1. [Batalova & Cohen 2002] Batalova, J. A. & P. N. Cohen, 2002, “Premarital Cohabitation and Housework: Couples in Cross-National Perspective,” Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(3): 743–55.
  2. [Blair & Lichter 1991] Blair, S. & D. Lichter, 1991, “Measuring the Division of Household Labor,” Journal of Family Issues, 12(1): 91–113. 144 Chapter 5 Gender segregation of housework
  3. [Blood & Wolfe 1960] Blood, R. O. & D. M. Wolfe, 1960, Husbands and Wives: The Dynamics of Married Living, Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.
  4. [Chang 2000] Chang, M. L., 2000, “The Evolution of Sex Segregation Regimes,” The American Journal of Sociology, 105(6): 1658–701.
  5. [Coltrane 2000] Coltrane, S., 2000, “Research on Household Labor: Modeling and Measuring the Social Embeddedness of Routine Family Work,” Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4): 1208–33.
  6. [England et al. 1988] England, P., G. Farkas, B. S. Kilbourne & T. Dou, 1988, “Explaining Occupational Sex Segregation and Wages: Findings from a Model with Fixed Effects,” American Sociological Review, 53(4): 544–58.
  7. [Estes et al. 2007] Estes, S. B., M. C. Noonan & D. J. Maume, 2007, “Is Work-Family Policy Use Related to the Gendered Division of Housework?,” Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28: 527–45.
  8. [Fuwa 2004] Fuwa, M., 2004, “Macro-level Gender Inequality and the Division of Household Labor in 22 Countries,” The American Sociological Review, 69(6): 751–67.
  9. [Fuwa & Tsutsui 2010] 不破麻紀子・筒井淳也, 2010, 「家事分担に対する不公平感の国 際比較分析」『家族社会学研究』 22(1): 52–63.
  10. [Geist 2005] Geist, C., 2005, “The Welfare State and the Home: Regime Differences in the Domestic Division of Labour,” European Sociological Review, 21(1): 23–41.
  11. [Hausman 1978] Hausman, J. A., 1978, “Specification Tests in Econometrics,” Econometrica, 46: 1251–71.
  12. [Inaba 2010] 稲葉昭英, 2010, 「NFRJ08 のデータ特性:予備標本・回収率・有配偶率」 『家族社会学研究』 22(2): 226–31.
  13. [Kitamura 2005] 北村行伸, 2005, 『パネルデータ分析』岩波書店.
  14. [Matsuda 2000] 松田茂樹, 2000, 「夫の家事・育児参加の規定要因」『年報社会学論集』 13: 134–45.
  15. [Matsuda 2004] 松田茂樹, 2004, 「男性の家事参加:家事参加を規定する要因」渡辺秀樹・稲葉昭英・嶋崎尚子編『現代家族の構造と変容:全国家族調査「NFRJ98」によ る計量分析』東京大学出版会, 175–89.
  16. [Matsuda & Suzuki 2000] 松田茂樹・鈴木征男, 2002, 「夫婦の労働時間と家事時間の関係:社会生活基本調査の個票データを用いた夫婦の家事時間の規定要因分析」『家族社会学研究』 13(2): 73–84.
  17. [Nagai 2010] 永井暁子, 2010, 「NFRJ08回答者の基本属性」『家族社会学研究』 22(2): 232–7.
  18. [Noonan 2001] Noonan, M. C., 2001, “The Impact of Domestic Work on Men’s and Women’s Wages,” Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(4): 1134–45.
  19. [Ochiai 1997] 落合恵美子, 1997, 『21 世紀家族へ:家族の戦後体制の見かた・超えかた』 (新版)有斐閣.
  20. [Ogasawara 2005] 小笠原祐子, 2005, 「有償労働の意味:共働き夫婦の生計維持分担意識の分析」『社会学評論』56(1): 165–81.
  21. [Shelton & John 1996] Shelton, B. A. & D. John, 1996, “The Division of Household Labor,” Annual Review of Sociology, 22: 285–92.
  22. [Thompson & Walker 1989] Thompson, L. & A. J. Walker, 1989, “Gender in Families: Women and Men in Marriage, Work, and Parenthood,” Journal of Marriage and Family, 51(4): 845–71.
  23. [Tomaskovic-Devey & Skaggs 2002] Tomaskovic-Devey, D. & S. Skaggs, 2002, “Sex Segregation, Labor Process Organization, and Gender Earnings Inequality,” The American Journal of Sociology, 108(1): 10–28.
  24. [Tomaskovic-Devey et al. 2006] Tomaskovic-Devey, D., K. Stainback, T. Taylor, C. Zimmer, C. Robinson & T. McTague, 2006, “Documenting Desegregation: Segregation in American Workplaces by Race, Ethnicity, and Sex, 1966–2003,” American Sociological Review, 71(4): 56–88.
  25. [Tsutsui 2005] Tsutsui, J., 2005, “Relative Resource or Available Time?: The Analysis of the Japanese Household Division of Labor through Multiple Models,” Nenpo Shakaigaku Ronshu, 18: 170–80.
  26. [Wooldridge 2002] Wooldridge, J., 2002, Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Note

The data for this secondary analysis, National Family Research of Japan 2008 {NFRJ08} by the NFRJ Committee, Japan Society of Family Sociology, was provided by the Social Science Japan Data Archive, Center for Social Research and Data Archives, Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo. An earlier version of this chapter was published in Japanese in the NFRJ08 Second Report (田中重人・永井暁子編, 2011, 『家族と仕事』日本家族社会学会 全国家族調査委員会, 55–73 {nfrj:nfrj08_201101_4}).


Communication

Questions/comments are welcome. Send your message to the editor via:


Tohoku University / Faculty of Arts and Letters / Applied Japanese Linguistics / TANAKA Sigeto / Family Change in an Aging Society with Low Fertility / Book


History of this page:


This page contains Japanese characters encoded in accordance with MS-Kanji: "Shift JIS".

Generated 2014-01-10 17:37 +0900 with Plain2.

Copyright (c) 2013, 2014 TANAKA Sigeto